Iodometric and Iodimetric Titrations
Iodine, thiosulfate and starch indicator
Lesson 3436 of 4,500 · Analytical Chemistry
Learning objectives
- Distinguish direct iodimetry from indirect iodometry
- Apply iodine–thiosulfate stoichiometry and interpret starch endpoint
Introduction
Iodine chemistry offers a flexible way to measure both reducing and oxidising analytes. In iodimetry, iodine is the oxidising titrant added directly to a reductant. In iodometry, an oxidising analyte first liberates iodine from iodide; the iodine is then measured with thiosulfate. Starch forms an intense blue complex with iodine-containing species, making a small remaining amount visible near the endpoint.
Core explanation
The basic iodine reduction is I₂ + 2e⁻ → 2I⁻. In iodimetry, a standardised iodine solution can oxidise a suitable reducing analyte, and the first slight excess iodine can be detected with starch or another endpoint method. The reaction ratio depends on electrons exchanged with that analyte. In aqueous iodide-rich solution, iodine is associated with I₃⁻ through I₂ + I⁻ ⇌ I₃⁻; this helps keep iodine dissolved. Stoichiometric bookkeeping can still be expressed in I₂ equivalents if the reactions are defined consistently.
In iodometry, an oxidising analyte reacts with added excess iodide to form iodine. For a generic two-electron oxidant Ox, write Ox + 2I⁻ → Red + I₂ after balancing its other atoms and charges. The released iodine is titrated by thiosulfate: I₂ + 2S₂O₃²⁻ → 2I⁻ + S₄O₆²⁻. Thus one mole I₂ corresponds to two moles thiosulfate. One must also apply the analyte-to-I₂ ratio from the first stage; thiosulfate moles do not necessarily equal analyte moles.
Starch forms a strong blue complex with iodine or triiodide. In the common iodometric endpoint, thiosulfate removes remaining iodine and the blue colour disappears. A typical procedure adds starch when the solution has become pale yellow, near the endpoint, because strong binding at high iodine concentration can make the final disappearance sluggish. Method-specific protocols control pH, timing and light exposure because iodine can volatilise or react with other components.
Consider copper(II) as an iodometric analyte in a suitable method: 2Cu²⁺ + 4I⁻ → 2CuI(s) + I₂. The precipitated CuI and liberated iodine are products of the first stage. One I₂ is produced by two Cu²⁺, then consumes two thiosulfate ions. Overall, one Cu²⁺ corresponds to one thiosulfate ion in that specific method. This equality emerges from combining both balanced equations; it should not be assumed for every iodometric analysis.
Step-by-step reasoning
1. Determine whether iodine is added directly or generated from iodide by the analyte. 2. Balance the analyte–iodine or analyte–iodide redox equation. 3. If iodine is titrated, use I₂ + 2S₂O₃²⁻ → 2I⁻ + S₄O₆²⁻. 4. Convert thiosulfate titre to iodine amount, then iodine amount to analyte amount. 5. Interpret the starch colour change under the method's specified conditions.
Visual explanation
Draw two routes. Route A: standardised I₂ burette → reducing analyte flask → first iodine excess, labelled iodimetry. Route B: oxidising analyte + excess I⁻ → I₂, then standardised thiosulfate burette → disappearance of blue starch colour, labelled iodometry. Put a “÷2” arrow between thiosulfate moles and I₂ moles on route B.
Real-world analogy
Indirect iodometry is like using a messenger. The oxidant cannot be counted easily by a direct colour change, so it releases a countable number of iodine messengers. Thiosulfate counts those messengers. The count is useful only if the first analyte-to-iodine conversion is known and iodine is not lost along the way.
Real-world example
An iodometric copper assay adds iodide to a Cu²⁺ solution, generating I₂ while CuI precipitates. Standard thiosulfate then measures the iodine. The analyst limits delay and follows the specified pH conditions to avoid iodine loss or interfering side reactions. This is a volumetric measurement even though a solid forms in the first stage.
Why?
Why does the blue colour vanish when thiosulfate reaches the iodometric endpoint? Thiosulfate reduces I₂ to I⁻, depleting the iodine-containing species that form the blue starch complex. Once essentially all iodine has reacted, the complex no longer produces the visible blue signal.
Common misconception
“Iodometry and iodimetry are synonyms” loses the direction of the assay. In iodimetry iodine is the added oxidising titrant; in iodometry the analyte liberates iodine from iodide and that iodine is measured. Another mistake is using a one-to-one I₂-to-thiosulfate ratio instead of the balanced one-to-two ratio.
Worked example
An oxidant liberates iodine in a one-to-one mole ratio. The iodine requires 20.00 mL of 0.1000 mol L⁻¹ thiosulfate. Thiosulfate amount is 0.02000 × 0.1000 = 0.002000 mol. Since one I₂ uses two thiosulfate, n(I₂) = 0.001000 mol. The oxidant amount is also 0.001000 mol under the stated first-stage ratio. A different oxidant equation would require a different final conversion.
Quick check
1. What observed change commonly marks the endpoint when iodine is titrated with thiosulfate in the presence of starch? Answer: The blue iodine–starch colour disappears as thiosulfate reduces the last visible iodine to iodide. The solution's other colours or turbidity can affect the observation.
Exam focus
State which iodine route is used, balance both stages and track mole ratios separately. Remember one I₂ per two thiosulfate ions. Explain starch as an endpoint signal rather than as the main oxidant or reductant. For real assays, note that iodine loss and unsuitable pH can bias results.
Advanced insight
Because I₂, I⁻ and I₃⁻ are linked by equilibrium, iodine concentration in solution depends on iodide level. This helps solubility but also means method conditions affect chemical activity. Indirect assays can amplify or translate an analyte signal into a well-behaved thiosulfate titration, yet every added conversion step is a potential recovery and uncertainty source.
Summary
Iodimetry uses iodine directly as an oxidising titrant. Iodometry generates iodine from iodide using an oxidising analyte, then measures it with thiosulfate. The iodine–thiosulfate reaction is one-to-two, and disappearance of the starch blue colour commonly signals the endpoint. Balanced first-stage chemistry is essential for analyte calculation.
Practice questions
1. How many moles thiosulfate react with 0.00500 mol I₂? Answer: 0.0100 mol S₂O₃²⁻, because two thiosulfate ions react per iodine molecule.
2. An oxidant generates I₂ from added iodide before titration. Is this iodometry or iodimetry? Answer: It is iodometry: iodine is generated indirectly by the analyte and then measured, commonly with thiosulfate.
3. Why must the analyte-to-iodine equation be known even when thiosulfate is standardised? Answer: Thiosulfate gives iodine amount, not analyte amount directly. The first reaction's stoichiometry is needed to convert iodine moles into analyte moles.